Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examined special educators' use of curriculum-based measurement as progress monitoring. Teacher characteristics were examined to determine if there was a relationship between certain teacher characteristics and utilizing curriculum-based measurement. A questionnaire was completed by 191 special educators in the Midwest. Results showed that 45% (n = 86) of the respondents utilized curriculum-based measurement for at least one purpose (monitoring ongoing progress, part of the prereferral process, evaluating programs, or identifying students with disabilities) and 55% (n = 105) did not use curriculum-based measurement. Curriculum-based measurement for progress monitoring in reading is utilized significantly more often than curriculum-based measurement in math or spelling. Teachers also responded that they had an interest in attending a workshop and reading information on curriculum-based measurement. Suggestions for practice and future research are explained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Swain et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: