Key result
Cardiovascular health knowledge increased linearly by 3.08% per year in students and continued to increase in adults before plateauing after age 40, correlating highly with educational achievement.
Why the study?
How does cardiovascular health knowledge change from childhood to adulthood?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,929)
How does cardiovascular health knowledge change from childhood to adulthood?
Cardiovascular health knowledge increases from childhood to early adulthood but plateaus after age 40, highlighting a potential gap in ongoing health education for older adults at higher risk of cardiovascular disease.
Suggests education gap after age 40; hypothesis-generating for lifelong CV literacy interventions.
A standardized test of cardiovascular health knowledge was administered to 1367 students, ages 12-18 years, and 562 adults, ages 20-60 years. Mean scores were: ages 12-14 years, 42.5 +/- 0.7% (SEM); 15-18 years, 49.1 +/- 0.1%; 20-40 years, 68.7 +/- 0.7%; 40-60 years, 68.2 +/- 0.7% correct. Cardiovascular health knowledge increased linearly in the student population, averaging 3.08% per year. Increases continued to occur in adults, but plateaued after age 40 years, despite an increasing incidence of cardiovascular disease in this age group. Health knowledge was highly correlated with the highest educational achievement. At all age levels, knowledge of diagnostic tests was highest and knowledge of pathophysiology lowest. A personal or family history of heart disease or history of an elevated serum cholesterol was not a stimulus for increases in health knowledge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
White et al. (1981) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular health knowledge (n=1,929). Age and educational achievement was evaluated on Cardiovascular health knowledge score. Cardiovascular health knowledge increased linearly by 3.08% per year in students and continued to increase in adults before plateauing after age 40, correlating highly with educational achievement.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: