The choice of grammatical framework in ICALL—the branch of CALL that applies artificial intelligence—has important implications for both research and development. Matthews (1993) argued for “choosing a [framework] that potentially meshes with SLA” (p. 5) and sketches three criteria which facilitate the crucial decision of selecting a grammatical framework for an ICALL system: computational effectiveness, linguistic perspicuity, acquisitional perspicuity. We will use Matthews ’ three adequacy criteria to review recent research in Construction Grammar and propose its application in ICALL, particularly in projects which involve the building of a student model. Construction grammar has the potential to help overcome some challenges in ICALL and to facilitate a more thorough analysis of learner language in context and thus improve our knowledge about language learning processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schulze et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: