Hybrids of equidistribution and Monte Carlo methods of integration can achieve the superior accuracy of the former while allowing the simple error estimation methods of the latter. One version, randomized $(t, m, s)$-nets, has the property that the integral estimates are unbiased and that the variance is $o(1/n)$, for any square integrable integrand. Stronger assumptions on the integrand allow one to find rates of convergence. This paper shows that for smooth integrands over s dimensions, the variance is of order n⁻³(log n)ˢ⁻¹, compared to n⁻¹ for ordinary Monte Carlo. Thus the integration errors are of order n-3/2(log n)(s-1)/2 in probability. This compares favorably with the raten⁻¹(log n)ˢ⁻¹$ for unrandomized $(t, m, s)$-nets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Art B. Owen (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: