Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exploration of program evaluation methods to enhance scholarly engagement among educators, suggesting important implications for curriculum improvement.
Program evaluation is an "essential responsibility" but is often not seen as a scholarly pursuit. While Boyer expanded what qualifies as educational scholarship, many still need to engage in processes that are rigorous and of a requisite academic standard to be labelled as scholarly. Many medical educators may feel that scholarly program evaluation is a daunting task due to the competing interests of curricular change, remediation, and clinical care. This paper explores how educators can take their questions around outcomes and efficacy of our programs and efficiently engage in education scholarship. The authors outline how educators can examine whether training programs have a desired impact and outcomes, and then how they might leverage this process into education scholarship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hosseini et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: