Key result
Polyhedral control Lyapunov functions in linear model predictive control formulations guarantee the maximal domain of attraction independently of the chosen finite horizon.
The paper presents novel linear model predictive control formulations using polyhedral control Lyapunov functions that guarantee the maximal domain of attraction and can be solved as Quadratic Programming problems.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Enables horizon-independent MPC design; extends Lyapunov theory for QP-solvable constrained control.
Polyhedral control Lyapunov functions (PCLFs) are exploited in finite-horizon linear model predictive control formulations in order to guarantee the maximal domain of attraction (DoA), in contrast to traditional formulations based on quadratic control Lyapunov functions. In particular, the terminal region is chosen as the largest DoA, namely the entire controllable set, which is parametrized by a level set of a suitable PCLF. Closed-loop stability of the origin is guaranteed either by using an "inflated" PCLF as terminal cost or by adding a contraction constraint for the PCLF evaluated at the current state. Two variants of the formulation based on the inflated PCLF terminal cost are also presented. In all proposed formulations, the guaranteed DoA is always the entire controllable set, independently of the chosen finite horizon. Closed-loop inherent robustness with respect to arbitrary, sufficiently small perturbations is also established. Moreover, all proposed schemes can be formulated as Quadratic Programming problems. Numerical examples show the main benefits and achievements of the proposed formulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grammatico et al. (2012) studied this question. Polyhedral control Lyapunov functions (PCLFs) vs. Quadratic control Lyapunov functions was evaluated. Polyhedral control Lyapunov functions in linear model predictive control formulations guarantee the maximal domain of attraction independently of the chosen finite horizon.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: