PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1976Heart192 citationsOpen Access

Left ventricular angiography on exercise. A new method of assessing left ventricular function in ischaemic heart disease.

BSB SharmaJGJ. F. GoodwinMRM. J. Raphael

Key Result

Left ventricular angiography during exercise revealed significant increases in LVEDV (P<0.01) and LVESV (P<0.02) in ischaemic heart disease patients with angina.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=21)

Structured PICO

Does left ventricular angiography on exercise differentiate left ventricular function between patients with ischaemic heart disease and normal subjects better than at rest?

P
Population
21 patients, including 17 with ischaemic heart disease and 4 with normal left ventricular function, evaluated using left ventricular angiography during exercise.
E
Exposure
Left ventricular angiography during supine leg exercise
C
Comparator
Left ventricular angiography at rest, and comparison between normal LV function and ischaemic heart disease groups
O
Outcome
Changes in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and end-systolic volume (LVESV) during exercisesurrogate

Left ventricular angiography during exercise reveals distinct changes in ventricular volumes that separate normal subjects from those with ischaemic heart disease, highlighting limitations of resting ejection fraction.

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.01

Abstract

Left ventricular function was studied in 17 patients with ischaemic heart disease and compared with 4 patients with normal left ventricular function. The patients in the homogeneous group of ischaemic heart disease were further subdivided into those 'without angina' (n=5) and those 'with angina' (n=12), depending upon the presence of angina during supine leg exercise at the time of definitive study. At rest there was no significant difference in the heart rate, cardiac output, stroke volume, and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in the three groups. During exercise the cardiac output and stroke volume were significantly depressed and LVEDP was significantly raised in the ischaemic heart disease group as a whole but within this group failed to show any significant difference in patients with and without angina. The left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and end-systolic volume (LVESV) measurements showed clear separation of these three groups only on exercise. On exercise, there was decrease in LVEDV and LVESV (P less than 0.05; P less than 0.02) in the group with normal left ventricular function, no change in the group with ischaemic heart disease without angina, and striking increase in LVEDV and LVESV in the group with ischaemic heart disease and angina (P less than 0.01 and P less than 0.02, respectively). This angiographic method of assessing left ventricular function shows clear separation of the three groups and also highlights the significance of angina. Ejection fraction (EF), a commonly measured parameter of left ventricular function, failed to reflect consistent changes on exercise as compared to values at rest which emphasizes the limitations of the measurement of ejection fraction at rest.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sharma et al. (1976) conducted an observational in Ischaemic heart disease (n=21). Left ventricular angiography on exercise vs. Normal left ventricular function was evaluated on Changes in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and end-systolic volume (LVESV) on exercise (p=<0.01). Left ventricular angiography during exercise revealed significant increases in LVEDV (P<0.01) and LVESV (P<0.02) in ischaemic heart disease patients with angina.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2010939d62e9997c04bd83https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.38.1.59
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper