T T IS well known that the intercorrelations •* • among intellectual tests are generally posi-tive. This fact provides the logical, scientific justification for the common practice of adding together scores obtained from diverse kinds of intellectual tasks to get a single score to repre-sent, operationally, a concept of general intelli-gence. Omnibus tests based upon this practice —tests such as the Stanford-Binet, Army Alpha, WAIS, Otis, etc.—have frequently been used to study the relationship between aging and change of intellectual ability. But as Cattell (1950; 1957) has emphasized, the fact of posi-tive manifold among the intercorrelations for a set of variables is not, in itself, sufficient evi-dence to support an hypothesis that the varia-bles represent a functional unity. And if the diverse subtests used in omnibus tests of intelli-gence do not form a functional unity, then studies of age differences in the scores obtained with these tests can be quite misleading. Factor analytic research has amply estab-lished the fact that the diverse tasks used in omnibus tests of intelligence involve several distinct ability functions, as represented by
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horn et al. (1966) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: