Key result
Impedance cardiography during pregnancy yielded invalid stroke volume calculations (calculated SV decreased by 19.2% ± 14.3% from week 12 to 35), indicating it cannot reliably assess cardiac output.
Why the study?
Can impedance cardiography reliably assess stroke volume and cardiac output in pregnant women?
Observational
Can impedance cardiography reliably assess stroke volume and cardiac output in pregnant women?
Impedance cardiography does not reliably assess stroke volume and cardiac output in pregnant women due to invalid data calculations.
Impedance cardiography should not be used for cardiac output assessment in pregnancy; leaves open validation of reliable noninvasive alternatives.
Impedance cardiography (ICG) has been proposed to estimate the stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) in various medical indications. The aim of this study was to explore the reliability of ICG during pregnancy with respect to SV and CO measurements. Blood pressure, heart rate and thoracic impedance were monitored during the course of pregnancy and related ICG patterns analyzed. We determined thoracic impedance (Z(0)), left ventricular ejection time (LVET) and the maximum value of the first derivative of the impedance waveform (dZ/dt)(max) beat-to-beat. The two main components of non-invasive SV estimation, LVET and (dZ/dt)(max), decreased in week 35 relative to week 12 by 7.6% ± 4.8% and by 36.0% ± 14.0%, respectively, based on a decrease in R-R interval of 9.9% ± 9.7%, whereas changes in Z(0) did not play a significant role. Furthermore, the decrease of (dZ/dt)(max) was greater in the third compared to the second trimester of pregnancy. Taking into account an 18.2% ± 6.8% body weight increase, the calculated SV decreased in week 35 relative to week 12 by 19.2% ± 14.3%. The normalized term ((dZ/dt)(max))/Z(0) explained 85-94% of the variance of SV change after week 20. These results were confirmed for fixed R-R interval at a constant value across the repeated measurements. Based on beat-to-beat analysis of the main components of non-invasive SV estimation by ICG, measured repeatedly throughout normal pregnancy, we conclude that SV calculations render invalid data. Our findings strongly suggest that CO cannot be reliably assessed with ICG in pregnant women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moertl et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Pregnancy. Impedance cardiography (ICG) was evaluated on Reliability of ICG for stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) measurements. Impedance cardiography during pregnancy yielded invalid stroke volume calculations (calculated SV decreased by 19.2% ± 14.3% from week 12 to 35), indicating it cannot reliably assess cardiac output.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: