Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
New estimates for the population risk are established for two-layer neural networks. These estimates are nearly optimal in the sense that the error rates scale in the same way as the Monte Carlo error rates. They are equally effective in the over-parametrized regime when the network size is much larger than the size of the dataset. These new estimates are a priori in nature in the sense that the bounds depend only on some norms of the underlying functions to be fitted, not the parameters in the model, in contrast with most existing results which are a posteriori in nature. Using these a priori estimates, we provide a perspective for understanding why two-layer neural networks perform better than the related kernel methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weinan et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: