PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2011Central European Journal of Public Health27 citationsOpen Access

Publication Bias in Epidemiological Studies

NSNazish Siddiqi

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Communication of research findings is the utmost responsibility of all scientists. Publication bias occurs if scientific studies with negative or null results fail to get published. This can happen due to bias in submitting, reviewing, accepting, publishing or aggregating scientific literature that fails to show positive results on a particular topic. Publication bias can make scientific literature unrepresentative of the actual research studies. This can give the reader a false impression about the beneficial effects of a particular treatment or intervention and can influence clinical decision making. Publication bias is more common than it is actually considered to be, but there are ways to detect and prevent it. This paper comments on the occurrence, types and consequences of publication bias and the strategies employed to detect and control it.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nazish Siddiqi (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a201470d40b4a263065ced0https://doi.org/10.21101/cejph.a3581
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials.1986 · 759 citations
  2. 2[The International Clinical Trials Registry Platform - ICTRP].2007 · 167 citations
  3. 3Case-Control Studies: Design, Conduct, Analysis1982 · 247 citations
  4. 4Reference bias in reports of drug trials.1987 · 224 citations
  5. 5Medical Research and the News Media2004 · 27 citations