In contrast to many other metal/metalloid contaminants, mercury (Hg) displays a complex environmental speciation behaviour. Widespread, detectable environmental Hg species include divalent mercury (Hg2+), elemental mercury (Hgo) and monomethylmercury (CH3Hg+). Less frequently encountered compounds include dimethylmercury ((CH3)2Hg; more common in marine environments), monovalent mercury (Hg22+; a species that disproportionates via the following reaction: Hg22+ ⟺ Hg2+ + Hgo) and, more recently, detectable quantities of ethylmercury compounds (e.g., C2H5Hg+, C2H5HgC2H5, etc.) have been reported in environmental media. Environmental mercury is frequently observed to be associated with natural organic matter in aquatic environments. The present study assesses the potential binding of Hg2+, Hgo, CH3Hg+ and (CH3)2Hg with natural organic matter by hydrophobic and ionic mechanisms. The findings suggest: (1) although potential hydrophobic binding with natural organic matter will likely occur in the following sequence (CH3)2Hg > Hgo > CH3HgX (where X = OH− or Cl−), none of these species appear to be strongly hydrophobic and hence, hydrophobic processes cannot explain observed organic matter-mercury associations in low-solids-content aquatic systems; (2) hydrophobic binding mechanisms of the various mercury species are insufficient to explain observed environmental bioconcentration factors; (3) ionic mercury binding with carboxyl-type sites on natural organic carbon is not sufficiently energetic to explain observed Hg-organic matter associations in the environment; and (4) environmental mercury binding with organic matter probably occurs through ionic reactions with naturally occurring sulfhydryl binding sites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicholas T. Loux (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: