Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this study we analyse with an experiment how the spatial area from which the species pool is sampled, i.e. local vs regional, can have functional consequences for ecosystem processes and structure. Particularly, we analysed how major stocks and processes respond to a change in basal productivity and how this depends on the source of the species pool. The experimental microcosms used in this experiment were developed by inoculating nutrient solution with samples of rockpool sediment containing resting stages. Here we show that communities developed from sediment samples of single origin (local communities) exhibit important differences in ecosystem structure and their response to a productivity gradient compared to systems developed from mixed samples of multiple and spatially dispersed origin (regional communities). The difference between local and regional communities was most pronounced for zooplankton which had much lower abundances in the local communities compared to the regional communities resulting in cascading effects on phytoplankton. We demonstrate that the spatial extend from which the species pool is sampled can affect ecosystem structure and functioning comparable in magnitude to changes in the basal productivity of the system. We discuss with a conceptual model how the regional species pool is important for sustaining diversity in functional groups, and how higher trophic levels are more sensitive to changes in the regional species pool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Næslund et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: