We construct <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0, ± 1</tex> sequences of length <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">(q²ˡ⁺¹-l)/(q-1)</tex> , where <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">q=2ˢ</tex> , with out-of-phase periodic autocorrelation <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0</tex> , and in-phase correlation <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">q²ˡ;</tex> SUch that the peak factor of radiation is <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">(q²ˡ⁺¹-1) /(q²⁺ˡ-q²ˡ)</tex> , which is close to <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</tex> as <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">q</tex> becomes large.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Høholdt et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: