Observational study distinguishes transparent diamonds from standard types, indicating optical differences.
Among a number of diamonds supplied to us by Professor W. T. Gordon, of King’s College, London, one, by a fortunate chance, was found to differ from the rest in its infra-red spectrum. Having confirmed by various methods th at a large absorption band at 8 g. present in the spectrum of all the other diamonds, was absent in this particular one, we explored photographically the ultra-violet spectrum of all the diamonds then available, and found th at the stone which was transparent at 8 p. in the infra-red was also transparent from about X 3000 to X 2250 in the ultra-violet, the other diamonds being opaque beyond X 3000. At this stage, between two and three hundred diamonds were examined visually by means of a simple ultra-violet spectroscope with fluorescent eye-piece without another diamond transparent beyond X 3000 being found. Among other physical and optical properties examined in comparison, little difference was found between diamonds of the usual and the transparent type : their waterwhiteness, density, refractive index, dielectric constant, Raman frequency and the earlier X-ray patterns appeared the same. A difference in the crystalline condition was, however, noted, for the transparent diamond was made up of a large number of parallel laminae, and it was also more nearly isotropic when examined by polarized light than the others.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robertson et al. (1933) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: