Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The field of proteomics has gained considerable momentum over the last years as new technologies and better instrumentation allowed the field to mature from what resembled a cottage industry into a high-throughput means to identify, characterize and quantify hundreds of proteins. The identifications and (relative) quantitation values obtained are often controversial however, as various techniques and different software platforms are used in the many laboratories worldwide. This Opinion attempts to shed some light on some of the underlying issues, and proposes certain guidelines authors can adhere to in order to allow others to validate their findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martens et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: