Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 2, 2020Experimental and Therapeutic MedicineOpen Access

Diagnostic efficacy of intravascular ultrasound combined with Gd2O3‑EPL contrast agent for patients with atherosclerosis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Gd2O3-EPL-IVUS demonstrated higher accuracy and sensitivity compared with IVUS alone in diagnosing atherosclerosis and measuring vessel size, plaque burden, and minimal lumen area.

Why the study?

Gd2O3-doped nanoparticle contrast agents have shown utility in disease diagnosis, prompting evaluation of eplerenone doped with Gd2O3 nanoparticles combined with IVUS for diagnosing patients suspected of atherosclerosis.

Does intravascular ultrasound combined with Gd2O3-eplerenone contrast agent improve diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity compared to IVUS alone in patients with suspected atherosclerosis?

Population

188 patients with suspected atherosclerosis

Comparison

Gd2O3-EPL-IVUS vs IVUS alone

Authors

SZShuangli ZhuCWChaoyang WenDBDongxue Bai

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

May enhance atherosclerosis diagnosis with IVUS; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=188)

Structured PICO

Does intravascular ultrasound combined with Gd2O3-eplerenone contrast agent improve diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity compared to IVUS alone in patients with suspected atherosclerosis?

P
Population
188 patients with suspected atherosclerosis evaluated for diagnostic accuracy using Gd2O3-EPL-IVUS versus IVUS alone.
I
Intervention
Intravascular ultrasound combined with Gd2O3-eplerenone (Gd2O3-EPL) contrast agent
C
Comparator
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) alone
O
Outcome
Diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity for atherosclerosissurrogate

The use of a novel Gd2O3-eplerenone contrast agent with intravascular ultrasound improves the diagnostic accuracy and visualization of coronary atherosclerotic plaques compared to standard IVUS.

Cite This Study

Zhu et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Suspected atherosclerosis (n=188). Gd2O3-EPL-IVUS vs. IVUS alone was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity. Gd2O3-EPL-IVUS demonstrated higher accuracy and sensitivity compared with IVUS alone in diagnosing atherosclerosis and measuring vessel size, plaque burden, and minimal lumen area.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2020ec35281a23f90df77dhttps://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9265
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Intracoronary imaging of coronary atherosclerosis: validation for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment2015 · 131 citations
  2. 2Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease in Asymptomatic Subjects With Advanced Vascular Atherosclerosis of the Carotid Artery (Type III and IV b Findings Using Ultrasound) and Risk Factors2018 · 57 citations
  3. 3Validity of Death Certificate and Hospital Discharge ICD Codes for Dementia Diagnosis2016 · 73 citations
  4. 4Association of Serum Vitamin D Level and Carotid Atherosclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis2017 · 47 citations
  5. 5Construction and validation of a plaque discrimination score from the anatomical and histological differences in coronary atherosclerosis: the Liverpool IVUS-V-HEART (Intra Vascular UltraSound-Virtual-Histology Evaluation of Atherosclerosis Requiring Treatment) study2014 · 17 citations