Key result
A prototype ring sensor was comparable to FDA-approved photoplethysmograph and EKG devices in detecting beat-to-beat pulsation despite disturbances.
Why the study?
Does a prototype ring sensor accurately detect beat-to-beat pulsation compared to FDA-approved devices despite disturbances?
Does a prototype ring sensor accurately detect beat-to-beat pulsation compared to FDA-approved devices despite disturbances?
A novel prototype ring sensor demonstrates comparable performance to FDA-approved devices for detecting beat-to-beat pulsation, offering potential for artifact-resistant long-term monitoring.
For pt. I see ibid., p. 2792-5 (2000). A miniaturized, telemetric, photoplethymographic sensor called a "ring sensor" for long-term monitoring is presented. A prototype ring sensor is designed and built based on the power budget analysis and the artifact-resistive attachment method. It is verified through experiments that the ring sensor is resistant to interfering forces and acceleration acting on the ring body. Benchmarking tests with FDA-approved photoplethysmograph and EKG reveal that the ring sensor is comparable to those devices in detecting beat-to-beat pulsation despite disturbances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rhee et al. (2002) studied this question. Ring sensor (miniaturized, telemetric, photoplethysmographic sensor) vs. FDA-approved photoplethysmograph and EKG was evaluated on Detecting beat-to-beat pulsation despite disturbances. A prototype ring sensor was comparable to FDA-approved photoplethysmograph and EKG devices in detecting beat-to-beat pulsation despite disturbances.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: