PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 20, 2009Occupational Medicine31 citationsOpen Access

Work-related mental ill-health and 'stress' in the UK (2002-05)

View Full Paper
MCMelanie CarderSTSarah TurnerRMRoseanne McNamee

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is concern about the frequency of work-related mental ill-health and 'stress' within the UK. AIMS: To provide a measure of the incidence of work-related mental ill-health reported by specialist psychiatrists and occupational physicians to UK voluntary reporting schemes during the period 2002-05. Additionally, an investigation of determinants, notably factors identified by reporters as precipitants in cases of work-related mental ill-health was undertaken. METHODS: The study used data collected by The Health and Occupation Reporting Network (THOR) from 2002 to 2005. Cases were analysed by age, gender, industry and precipitating event. RESULTS: Estimated annual average incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals of work-related mental ill-health diagnoses reported to THOR between 2002 and 2005 by psychiatrists were 89 (78, 101) per million and by occupational physicians were 1589 (1443, 1735) per million. For both groups of reporters, anxiety and depression continued to make up the largest proportion of diagnoses. The majority of cases were attributed to factors such as workload and difficulties with other workers. There was some suggestion that the type of factors associated with the mental ill-health case reports varied between industrial sectors. CONCLUSIONS: Work-related anxiety and depression and stress continue to constitute a significant proportion of all work-related mental ill-health diagnoses in the UK, with workload and interpersonal relationships reported as significant risk factors. Further investigations may determine whether guidance for employers and employees on work-related mental ill-health would benefit from being more industry specific.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carder et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20245deaa49a33b5fbf52chttps://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqp117
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1'Referral into a void': opinions of general practitioners and others on single point of access to mental health care2005 · 14 citations
  2. 2The estimated workforce served by occupational physicians in the UK2002 · 39 citations
  3. 3Reported incidence and precipitating factors of work-related stress and mental ill-health in the United Kingdom (1996–2001)2006 · 44 citations
  4. 4The incidence of work-related disease reported by occupational physicians, 1996-20012002 · 44 citations
  5. 5The validity and reliability of diagnoses of work-related mental ill-health2008 · 26 citations