Key result
The Tamil version of the DS-14 demonstrated a four-factor structure explaining 75.6% of variance and showed strong convergent validity with neuroticism (r = 0.84, P < 0.001) among Indian patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Why the study?
Type D personality is linked to negative outcomes after acute myocardial infarction, but its factor structure, reliability, and validity had not been determined among patients with AMI in the Indian clinical setting.
Is the Tamil version of the DS-14 a valid and reliable tool for assessing Type D personality in Indian patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Cross-Sectional (n=200)
No
Is the Tamil version of the DS-14 a valid and reliable tool for assessing Type D personality in Indian patients with acute myocardial infarction?
The Tamil version of the DS-14 is a valid and reliable tool for assessing Type D personality in Indian patients with acute myocardial infarction, though item 14 may require modification.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports Tamil DS-14 use in Indian AMI patients; leaves open prognostic validation and outcome studies.
Background: Type D personality has been linked to negative outcomes following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Our objective was to determine the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Type D personality construct among people with AMI in the Indian clinical setting. Materials and Methods: In a cross-sectional study conducted between August 2016 and July 2017, 200 consecutive patients with AMI admitted to a tertiary care center completed the Tamil version of the Type D scale-14 (DS-14). The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised-Short Form (EPQR-S) was also administered to check the convergent/divergent validity. Results: The prevalence of Type D personality was 24%. Results of the principal components analysis revealed a four-factor solution for the Tamil version of the DS-14 which explained more than 75% of the variability. Strong convergent validity with the neuroticism subscale of EPQR-S (r = 0.84, P < 0.001) and divergent validity with the extraversion subscale (r = −0.75, P < 0.001) was noted. The two subscales of the Type D scale, negative affectivity and social inhibition (SI), demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach's alpha of 0.85 and 0.76, respectively). Dropping item no 14 from the DS-14 led to significant increase in internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.81) for the SI subconstruct. Conclusion: Among an Indian Tamil-speaking clinical sample of patients with AMI, Type D is a valid construct and can be assessed using the regional version of the DS-14 which showed a four-factor structure and good psychometric properties. Item no. 14 of the DS-14 scale may need modification for the Indian setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Menon et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute myocardial infarction (n=200). Tamil version of the Type D scale-14 (DS-14) was evaluated on Factor structure and validity of the Tamil version of the DS-14. The Tamil version of the DS-14 demonstrated a four-factor structure explaining 75.6% of variance and showed strong convergent validity with neuroticism (r = 0.84, P < 0.001) among Indian patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: