Key result
Doppler ultrasound performed in a dedicated stroke prevention clinic demonstrated a highly accurate overall misclassification rate of 1.45% compared to conventional cerebral angiography.
Why the study?
Does Doppler ultrasound accurately assess internal carotid artery stenosis compared to conventional cerebral angiography in patients at a stroke prevention clinic?
Observational (n=67)
Blinded reviewers
No
Does Doppler ultrasound accurately assess internal carotid artery stenosis compared to conventional cerebral angiography in patients at a stroke prevention clinic?
Doppler ultrasound performed in a dedicated stroke prevention clinic is highly accurate for assessing internal carotid artery stenosis, with a misclassification rate of only 1.45% compared to conventional angiography.
Supports Doppler accuracy for carotid stenosis in dedicated clinics; leaves open prospective validation before wider adoption.
INTRODUCTION: Doppler ultrasound (DUS) is used as a screening tool to assess internal carotid artery (ICA) disease. Recent reports suggest that the DUS may be inaccurate in over 28% of patients. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of DUS, when performed in a dedicated stroke prevention clinic (SPC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who had a DUS performed in our SPC, followed by conventional cerebral angiography. Three groups of patients were defined. Group 1 had DUS measured ICA stenosis of >50%; Group II had a DUS measured ICA stenosis of <50%; Group III had complete ICA occlusion on DUS. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients (69 arteries) were included in the study. There were 45 patients in Group I and based on the findings of cerebral angiography, carotid endarterectomy was considered inappropriate in only one patient--a misclassification rate of 2.2% (95% CI: 0 - 6.5%). Group II consisted of 19 patients and on cerebral angiography, none of these patients had a stenosis of >50%--a misclassification rate of 0%. Group III consisted of five patients in whom DUS showed complete ICA occlusion. The angiogram confirmed the occlusion in all five patients--a misclassification rate of 0%. Overall, misclassification rate was 1.45% (95% CI: 0 - 4.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Doppler ultrasound when performed in a stroke prevention clinic (SPC), has a high accuracy in measuring ICA stenosis of >50%. Doppler ultrasound is reliable in detecting complete ICA occlusion and finally DUS is a reliable screening tool to rule out clinically significant ICA stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dean et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Transient ischemic attack (TIA) or ischemic stroke (n=67). Doppler ultrasound vs. Conventional cerebral angiography was evaluated on Overall misclassification rate for determining suitability for carotid endarterectomy (1.45%, 95% CI 0 - 4.3). Doppler ultrasound performed in a dedicated stroke prevention clinic demonstrated a highly accurate overall misclassification rate of 1.45% compared to conventional cerebral angiography.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: