Key result
A FACTS score ≥6 was significantly associated with the presence of a paravalvular leak post-TAVI (p=0.01).
Why the study?
Does the FACTS scoring system and valve plaque density on pre-procedural CT predict procedure-related complications in patients undergoing TAVI?
Cohort (n=20)
Double-blind
No
Does the FACTS scoring system and valve plaque density on pre-procedural CT predict procedure-related complications in patients undergoing TAVI?
p-value: p=0.01
The FACTS CT scoring system and valve plaque density measurement show potential for predicting paravalvular leak and other procedure-related complications in patients undergoing TAVI.
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) provides an acceptable alternative for aortic valve replacement in the elderly, but needs accurate pre-procedural imaging to optimise intervention. Objectives: To evaluate an alternative manual aortic valve calcification scoring system with computed tomography, for patients undergoing TAVI. We hypothesise a correlation between the Free State aortic valve calcium computed tomography score (FACTS) scoring system, valve plaque density and procedure-related complications. Methods: Twenty patients suitable for TAVI were selected according to standard international guidelines and received multimodality imaging prior to intervention. Images were reviewed by two reviewers who were blinded to each other’s scores. Where large inter-individual score variations existed, retraining was done and scores repeated, using a double-blinded method. Matched scores were included in the final analysis. Rosenhek calcification scores were used as a standard of reference. Results: The study comprised 9 (45%) men and 11 (55%) women, with a median age of 83.5 years. Median EuroSCORE was 15.5. FACTS scores ≥6 were associated with the presence of a paravalvular leak (p = 0.01). Procedure-related complications (left bundle branch block, repositioning of the valve and anaemia) were seen in patients with plaques measuring ≥1000 HU (p = 0.07). Conclusion: The FACTS score and averaged valve plaque HU showed potential for predicting a paravalvular leak and procedure-related complications, and could be valuable in the future for optimising patient selection for TAVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reinders et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Aortic stenosis (n=20). FACTS score ≥6 vs. FACTS score <6 was evaluated on Presence of paravalvular leak post TAVI (p=0.01). A FACTS score ≥6 was significantly associated with the presence of a paravalvular leak post-TAVI (p=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: