PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 31, 2026Frontiers in Neuroscience0 citationsOpen Access

Biological markers of hearing loss in neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis

STSally K. ThorntonUniversity of NottinghamRPRoshni PatelUniversity of NottinghamSSSandra SmithUniversity of Nottingham

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background: Infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units are at increased risk of hearing loss, yet early identification remains challenging. Understanding circulating biomarkers of hearing loss may improve risk stratification and inform targeted surveillance and intervention. Objectives: To assess whether biological factors measured in bodily fluids predict hearing loss in neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analyses were conducted (registration ID: CRD42024531492). Comprehensive searches were undertaken to identify peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2025 evaluating fluid biomarkers and hearing outcomes in neonates. Risk of bias was assessed across five domains. Biomarkers were grouped by biological domain and synthesised narratively. Where feasible, random-effects meta-analyses were performed using odds ratios and restricted maximum likelihood estimation for calculation of pooled effect sizes. Results: = 32 studies), particularly congenital cytomegalovirus, meningitis, and invasive fungal infections showed significant associations with hearing loss. Risk of bias was moderate to high across studies, driven by inconsistent hearing outcomes measures, poor repeatability of biomarker measures and limited inclusion of risk factors and confounders which affect biomarker concentrations. Discussion: Systemic neonatal biomarkers, particularly unbound bilirubin and infective markers, show consistent associations with hearing loss, though high heterogeneity limits precision. Evidence was heterogeneous and largely exploratory. Future studies should utilise integrated databases where data have rigorous confounder adjustment, standardised biomarker assessments, and validated hearing outcome measures to identify clinically meaningful biomarkers of hearing loss. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024531492.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thornton et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2029f23224f8dacd0dfc10https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2026.1796635
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper