Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reflections examine risks and strengths in researching family estrangement among vulnerable populations, suggesting new models to enhance participant safety.
In this article I examine some issues involved in researching vulnerable populations and sensitive issues, and the challenges and risks of researching issues of a deeply personal nature. Participants might have complex needs and vulnerabilities, but they also have many resources to ensure their own well-being. I ask researchers to move beyond the minimum standards espoused by human ethics committees, and utilize participant strengths to further reduce the risk of harm. My reflections on a study of older people who were experiencing family estrangement highlight some of the actions that participants used to increase their personal safety. I discuss the usefulness of "strengths" questions in assessing risk and facilitating participant strengths to minimize harm. Finally, I propose a three-way model for reducing risk that involves the "lessons learned" from ethics committees, researchers, and the participants themselves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kylie Agllias (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: