Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Spectrophotometry of SN 1996al carried out throughout 15 yr is presented. The early photometry suggests that SN 1996al is a linear Type II supernova, with an absolute peak of M V -18.2 mag. Early spectra present broad asymmetric Balmer emissions, with superimposed narrow lines with P-Cygni profile, and He I features with asymmetric broad emission components. The analysis of the line profiles shows that the H and He broad components form in the same region of the ejecta. By day +142, the H profile dramatically changes: the narrow P-Cygni profile disappears, and the H is fitted by three emission components that will be detected over the remaining 15 yr of the supernova (SN) monitoring campaign. Instead, the He I emissions become progressively narrower and symmetric. A sudden increase in flux of all He I lines is observed between 300 and 600 d. Models show that the SN luminosity is sustained by the interaction of low-mass (1.15 M ) ejecta, expelled in a low kinetic energy (1.6 10 50 erg) explosion, with highly asymmetric circumstellar medium. The detection of H emission in pre-explosion archive images suggests that the progenitor was most likely a massive star (25 M ZAMS) that had lost a large fraction of its hydrogen envelope before explosion, and was hence embedded in a H-rich cocoon. The low-mass ejecta and modest kinetic energy of the explosion are explained with massive fallback of material into the compact remnant, a 7-8-M black hole.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benetti et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: