SUMMARY The interaction test for 2 x 2 x t contingency tables of Zelen (1971) is extended to 2 x 8 x t tables. This test is related to the tests of partial association, or 'main effect', of Birch (1965) and Armitage (1966). These tests are frequency analogues of the log-frequency tests con- sidered by Plackett (1962) and Goodman (1964). The various analyses are illustrated and compared in several numerical examples. Bartlett (1935) considered a model and statistical analysis for interaction in 2 x 2 x 2 tables. Norton (1945) generalized these results to 2 x 2 x t tables and Roy & Kastenbaum (1956) gave the general r x s x t results. These authors used tests based on Pearson's chi- squared statistic with parameters fitted by iterative maximum likelihood methods. Woolf (1955), using the same concept of interaction, gave a much simpler, asymptotically equiva- lent test for 2 x 2 x t tables based on the logit transformation of the data. Plackett (1962) extended Woolf's result to the general three-dimensional table and Goodman (1964) showed how Plackett's test statistics might be more easily computed, particularly for 2 x s x t tables. For further discussion and references on the various models and analyses of three-dimensional contingency tables, see Lancaster (1969, Chapter XII) and Plackett (1969). More recently, various authors have discussed simplified iterative maximum likeli- hood estimation techniques in three-dimensional tables and Goodman (1970) has extended these results to m-dimensional tables. Zelen (1971) derived a conditional test for interaction in 2 x 2 x t tables based on the reference set of all fixed marginal totals. The asymptotic version of this test may be con- sidered the analogue, in the untransformed space, of Woolf's logit test. This paper extends Zelen's test to 2 x s x t tables; the resulting test is the close analogue, in the untransformed space, of Goodman's logit analyses for such tables. The structure of the test statistic is analogous to a sum of squares in an analysis of variance. The summed terms are related to the usual homogeneity chi-squares for the s 2 x t tables and the 'correction term' is Birch's (1965) test statistic for partial association, or 'main effect'.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John J. Gart (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: