Key result
Ticagrelor significantly increased global myocardial blood flow compared with clopidogrel at intermediate-dose adenosine (1.28 vs 1.13 mL/min per gram; P=0.002) in stable coronary artery disease.
Why the study?
Does ticagrelor improve myocardial blood flow compared to clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
RCT (n=22)
Double-blind
Crossover
Does ticagrelor improve myocardial blood flow compared to clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
Ticagrelor potentiates adenosine-induced myocardial blood flow increases compared to clopidogrel in patients with stable CAD, providing a potential mechanism for its non-antiplatelet mortality benefits.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports adenosine-mediated vasodilation as a ticagrelor mechanism in stable CAD; extends prior evidence on pleiotropic effects beyond platelet inhibition.
Background Ticagrelor is a P2Y 12 receptor inhibitor used in acute coronary syndromes to reduce platelet activity and to decrease thrombus formation. Ticagrelor is associated with a reduction in mortality incremental to that observed with clopidogrel, potentially related to its non–antiplatelet effects. Evidence from animal models indicates that ticagrelor potentiates adenosine‐induced myocardial blood flow ( MBF ) increases. We investigated MBF at rest and during adenosine‐induced hyperemia in patients with stable coronary artery disease treated with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel. Methods and Results This randomized double‐blinded crossover study included 22 patients who received therapeutic interventions of ticagrelor 90 mg orally twice a day for 10 days and clopidogrel 75 mg orally once a day for 10 days, with a washout period of at least 10 days between the treatments. Global and regional MBF and myocardial flow reserve were measured using rubidium 82 positron emission tomography/computed tomography at baseline and during intermediate‐ and high‐dose adenosine. Global MBF was significantly greater with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel (1.28±0.55 versus 1.13±0.47 mL/min per gram, P =0.002) at intermediate‐dose adenosine and not different at baseline (0.65±0.19 versus 0.60±0.15 mL/min per gram, P =0.084) and at high‐dose adenosine (1.64±0.40 versus 1.61±0.19 mL/min per gram, P =0.53). In regions with impaired myocardial flow reserve (<2.5), MBF was greater with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel during intermediate and high doses of adenosine ( P <0.0001), whereas the differences were not significant at baseline. Conclusions Ticagrelor potentiates global and regional adenosine‐induced MBF increases in patients with stable coronary artery disease. This effect may contribute to the incremental mortality benefit compared with clopidogrel. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 01894789.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pelletier‐Galarneau et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Stable coronary artery disease (n=22). Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel 75 mg orally once a day was evaluated on Global myocardial blood flow at intermediate-dose adenosine (p=0.002). Ticagrelor significantly increased global myocardial blood flow compared with clopidogrel at intermediate-dose adenosine (1.28 vs 1.13 mL/min per gram; P=0.002) in stable coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: