Key result
Early impedance dynamics predict effective epicardial RF ablation lesions with ~0.78 AUROC.
Why the study?
Biophysical predictors of effective local epicardial radiofrequency ablation during epicardial ablation in robotic-enhanced hybrid ablation for PsAF and LSPAF are unknown.
Do early biophysical parameters, specifically baseline impedance and early impedance drop, predict effective local epicardial radiofrequency ablation during robotic-enhanced hybrid ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=92)
Yes
Do early biophysical parameters, specifically baseline impedance and early impedance drop, predict effective local epicardial radiofrequency ablation during robotic-enhanced hybrid ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Continuous monitoring of baseline impedance and early impedance drops can reliably predict acute tissue destruction during epicardial hybrid ablation, offering a clinical scoring tool to halt ineffective applications and improve procedural efficiency.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid real-time lesion assessment in hybrid AF ablation; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Background: Hybrid ablation can manage persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF). Robotic-enhanced hybrid ablation (RE-HA) offers greater precision and stability. However, biophysical predictors of effective local epicardial radiofrequency ablation (ELRF) during epicardial ablation are unknown. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the time course of biophysical predictors of ELRF and no-ELRF during the first stage of RE-HA in patients with PsAF and LSPAF. Methods: We conducted a dual-center retrospective cohort study involving 92 consecutive patients with PsAF or LSPAF who underwent RE-HA between January 2021 and May 2024. Epicardial electrogram disappearance, defined as a reduction of bipolar voltages to <0.05 mV, baseline impedance (BI), and impedance drop (ID), were compared between ELRF and no-ELRF cases. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify predictive variables. Optimal cutoff values were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: Among 2474 radiofrequency (RF) applications, significant predictors of ELRF included BI and ID at 1 and 8 seconds, with optimal cutoff values of <107, 0-7, and 5-17 Ω. The composite predictive model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.775, with 94% sensitivity, 53% specificity, and 65% accuracy. Our predictive ELRF score ranged from 0-4, and the Youden J test identifying a cutoff value of 3 as optimal. Conclusion: BI and progressive ID were strong predictors of local epicardial RE-HA efficacy. The composite model was a reliable tool for early identification of ELRF, potentially reducing RF delivery and enhancing procedural efficiency. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Celentano et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (n=92). Baseline impedance (BI) and progressive impedance drop (ID) at 1 and 8 seconds was evaluated on Effective local epicardial radiofrequency ablation (ELRF), defined as post-ablation electrogram disappearance (bipolar voltage <0.05 mV) (AUROC 0.775, 95% CI 0.747-0.804). A composite predictive model based on baseline impedance and impedance drop at 1 and 8 seconds reliably identified effective epicardial radiofrequency ablation lesions with an AUROC of 0.775.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: