Key result
The Eriksen flanker task elicited the highest activation in the superior and middle frontal gyrus during identical trials, while incompatible trials showed more effortful processing than compatible.
Why the study?
Prior fNIRS studies of the flanker task showed an inverted conflict effect, but failed to separate identical and compatible conditions, leaving unclear whether this discrepancy occurs during stimulus processing or response generation.
The study suggests that the highest activation in identical trials during the flanker task may reflect processes like perceptual familiarity or strategic readjustment rather than the standard conflict effect.
Previous functional near-infrared spectroscopy studies using the Eriksen flanker task, in contrast to functional magnetic resonance imaging studies, revealed the quite puzzling finding of an inverted conflict effect, that is, greater middle and superior frontal activation in response compatible than in response incompatible trials. However, since neither prior functional near-infrared spectroscopy studies nor most previous functional magnetic resonance imaging studies separated between an identical and a compatible condition, it is hard to pinpoint whether this discrepancy occurs on the level of stimulus processing or response generation. By assigning two letters to both left (D, F) and right (J, K) hand reactions, we were able to separate identical (e.g., JJJ) and compatible (e.g., JKJ) conditions that solely differ in their stimulus congruency. Replicating prior functional magnetic resonance imaging findings, we found the standard conflict effect at the transition of superior and middle frontal gyrus, when comparing the activation in compatible trials to that in incompatible trials. Both changes in oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin thus pointed to more effortful processing in incompatible trials. Interestingly, however, identical trials showed the highest activation in this region, according to both changes in oxygenated and deoxygenated blood. A finding that mirrors and extends prior functional near-infrared spectroscopy findings, which only regarded oxygenated blood. We argue that this pattern of results does not reflect the standard conflict effect. We rather assume that other processes like perceptual familiarity or strategic readjustment might be at play.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geißler et al. (2020) studied this question. Eriksen flanker task vs. Compatible and incompatible trials was evaluated on Changes in oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin in the superior and middle frontal gyrus. The Eriksen flanker task elicited the highest activation in the superior and middle frontal gyrus during identical trials, while incompatible trials showed more effortful processing than compatible.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: