Key result
Running on a curved non-motorized treadmill required a 22% higher percentage of VO2peak compared to overground running and 16% higher compared to motorized treadmill running.
Why the study?
Does running on a curved non-motorized treadmill increase cardiometabolic demands compared to overground and motorized treadmill running in trained runners?
Does running on a curved non-motorized treadmill increase cardiometabolic demands compared to overground and motorized treadmill running in trained runners?
Running on a curved non-motorized treadmill requires significantly higher cardiometabolic demand than overground or motorized treadmill running at the same speed, particularly for lighter runners.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Curved non-motorized treadmills may elevate cardiometabolic demands at matched speeds; leaves open effects on training adaptations and performance.
The aim of this study was to compare the cardiometabolic demands of running on a curved non-motorized treadmill (cNMT) with overground (OVR) and motorized treadmill (MOT) running. Fourteen trained male (n = 7) and female (n = 7) runners (V̇O2peak 56.6 ± 4.0 mL.kg-1.min-1) participated in the study. Each experimental session consisted of 5 x 6-min bouts of running at progressively higher speeds, separated by 6-min rest (females 9-15 km.h-1; males 10.5-16.5 km.h-1). Oxygen consumption (V̇O2) and heart rate (HR) during the last 2 min of each bout were measured using a portable metabolic cart. Running at a set speed on the cNMT required a higher percentage of V̇O2peak than OVR (mean ± 90% CI, 22 ± 6%; ES ± 90% CI, 1.87 ± 0.15) and MOT (16 ± 6%; ES 1.50 ± 0.15) running. Similarly, HR during the cNMT was higher compared to OVR (25 ± 9 beats.min-1, ES 1.23 ± 0.14) and MOT (22 ± 9 beats.min-1, ES 1.35 ± 0.13) trials. The decline in running economy observed during the cNMT trial was negatively related to body mass (R2 0.493, P = 0.01), indicating lighter runners were required to work at a higher relative intensity to overcome treadmill belt resistance. These data demonstrate the higher cardiometabolic demand associated with running at a given speed on the cNMT. It is critical these differences are taken into account when prescribing training intensities on the cNMT or translating data from the laboratory to an athletic setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edwards et al. (2017) studied Healthy trained runners (n=14). Curved non-motorized treadmill (cNMT) running vs. Overground (OVR) and motorized treadmill (MOT) running was evaluated on Percentage of VO2peak (MD 22%, 95% CI 16-28). Running on a curved non-motorized treadmill required a 22% higher percentage of VO2peak compared to overground running and 16% higher compared to motorized treadmill running.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: