Key result
Pharmacogenetic dosing algorithms significantly underestimated the daily warfarin maintenance dose compared to clinically tailored dosing (mean 5.2-5.4 mg vs 6.9 mg; P<0.006) in severe thrombosis.
Why the study?
Warfarin dose requirement varies significantly, and performance of genetic dosing algorithms compared to clinically established doses in patients with severe thrombosis or thrombophilia was unclear.
Does the clinically established warfarin maintenance dose differ from genetic dosing algorithm estimates in patients with severe thrombosis and/or thrombophilia?
Observational (n=50)
No
Does the clinically established warfarin maintenance dose differ from genetic dosing algorithm estimates in patients with severe thrombosis and/or thrombophilia?
Pharmacogenetic dosing algorithms may underestimate the required warfarin maintenance dose in patients with severe thrombosis and/or thrombophilia.
May warrant caution using pharmacogenetic algorithms for warfarin in severe thrombosis; leaves open need for prospective validation in larger cohorts.
AIMS: Warfarin dose requirement varies significantly. We compared the clinically established doses based on international normalized ratio (INR) among patients with severe thrombosis and/or thrombophilia with estimates from genetic dosing algorithms. METHODS: Fifty patients with severe thrombosis and/or thrombophilia requiring permanent anticoagulation, referred to the Helsinki University Hospital Coagulation Center, were screened for thrombophilias and genotyped for CYP2C9*2 (c.430C>T, rs1799853), CYP2C9*3 (c.1075A>C, rs1057910) and VKORC1 c.-1639G>A (rs9923231) variants. The warfarin maintenance doses (target INR 2.0-3.0 in 94%, 2.5-3.5 in 6%) were estimated by the Gage and the International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium (IWPC) algorithms. The individual warfarin maintenance dose was tailored, supplementing estimates with comprehensive clinical evaluation and INR data. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 47 years (range 20-76), and BMI 27 (SD 6), 68% being women. Forty-six (92%) had previous venous or arterial thrombosis, and 26 (52%) had a thrombophilia, with 22% having concurrent aspirin. A total of 40% carried the CYP2C9*2 or *3 allele and 54% carried the VKORC1-1639A allele. The daily mean maintenance dose of warfarin estimated by the Gage algorithm was 5.4 mg (95% CI 4.9-5.9 mg), and by the IWPC algorithm was 5.2 mg (95% CI 4.7-5.7 mg). The daily warfarin maintenance dose after clinical visits and follow-up was higher than the estimates, mean 6.9 mg (95% CI 5.6-8.2 mg, P < 0.006), with highest dose in patients having multiple thrombophilic factors (P < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In severe thrombosis and/or thrombophilia, variation in thrombin generation and pharmacodynamics influences warfarin response. Pharmacogenetic dosing algorithms seem to underestimate dose requirement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Helin et al. (2019) conducted an observational in severe thrombosis and/or thrombophilia (n=50). Pharmacogenetic dosing algorithms vs. Clinically tailored dosing was evaluated on Daily warfarin maintenance dose (p=<0.006). Pharmacogenetic dosing algorithms significantly underestimated the daily warfarin maintenance dose compared to clinically tailored dosing (mean 5.2-5.4 mg vs 6.9 mg; P<0.006) in severe thrombosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: