Key result
Cardiogenic shock cuts enteral esomeprazole absorption by ~50% versus elective cardiac surgery controls.
Why the study?
It is not well known how drug absorption and metabolism are altered in critically ill cardiac patients receiving parenteral and enteral food and drugs.
Does cardiogenic shock alter the absorption and metabolism of enterally administered esomeprazole compared to stable cardiovascular patients undergoing elective surgery?
Cohort (n=25)
Open-label
No
Does cardiogenic shock alter the absorption and metabolism of enterally administered esomeprazole compared to stable cardiovascular patients undergoing elective surgery?
Cardiogenic shock significantly impairs gastrointestinal drug absorption and hepatic metabolism via CYP3A4, indicating that vital medications should be given intravenously in this population to maintain adequate blood levels.
Cardiogenic shock impairs enteral esomeprazole absorption; hypothesis-generating for route considerations in shock, prospective validation needed.
(1) Background: In critically ill cardiac patients, parenteral and enteral food and drug administration routes may be used. However, it is not well known how drug absorption and metabolism are altered in this group of adult patients. Here, we analyze drug absorption and metabolism in patients after cardiogenic shock using the pharmacokinetics of therapeutically indicated esomeprazole. (2) Methods: The pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole were analyzed in a consecutive series of patients with cardiogenic shock and controls before and after elective cardiac surgery. Esomeprazole was administered orally or with a nasogastric tube and once as an intravenous infusion. (3) Results: The maximum plasma concentration and AUC of esomeprazole were, on average, only half in critically ill patients compared with controls (p < 0.005) and remained lower even seven days later. Interestingly, esomeprazole absorption was also markedly compromised on day 1 after elective surgery. The metabolites of esomeprazole showed a high variability between patients. The esomeprazole sulfone/esomeprazole ratio reflecting CYP3A4 activity was significantly lower in critically ill patients even up to day 7, and this ratio was negatively correlated with CRP values (p = 0.002). The 5′-OH-esomeprazole and 5-O-desmethyl-esomeprazol ratios reflecting CYP2C19 activity did not differ significantly between critically ill and control patients. (4) Conclusions: Gastrointestinal drug absorption can be significantly reduced in critically ill cardiac patients compared with elective patients with stable cardiovascular disease. The decrease in bioavailability indicates that, under these conditions, any vital medication should be administered intravenously to maintain high levels of medications. After shock, hepatic metabolism via the CYP3A4 enzyme may be reduced.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harnisch et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Cardiogenic shock (n=25). Cardiogenic shock vs. Elective cardiac surgery was evaluated on Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and AUC of esomeprazole (Reduced by approximately half, p=<0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: