Key result
CAC score over 400 is linked to ~18.4-fold higher MACE risk compared to zero.
Why the study?
To examine the prevalence and CAC score distribution and evaluate the association of absolute versus age-sex-specific percentile CAC score classifications with MACE in a Thai clinical cohort.
Does the coronary artery calcium (CAC) score predict major adverse cardiovascular events in a Thai clinical cohort, and does absolute score or age-sex-specific percentile perform better?
Cohort (n=440)
No
Does the coronary artery calcium (CAC) score predict major adverse cardiovascular events in a Thai clinical cohort, and does absolute score or age-sex-specific percentile perform better?
Hazard Ratio: 18.4 (95% CI 5.38–62.87)
Absolute Event Rate: 258.2% vs 9.9%
p-value: p=≤0.001
In a Thai clinical cohort, absolute CAC score classification may be more suitable and consistent for cardiovascular risk stratification compared to age-sex-specific percentiles.
May support absolute CAC scoring for MACE stratification in Thai patients; extends Western data but leaves generalizability and percentile comparisons open.
Purposes: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score provides a quantification of atherosclerotic plaque within the coronary arteries. This study aimed to examine the prevalence and CAC score distribution and to evaluate the association of each CAC score classifications with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in a Thai clinical cohort. Methods: , respectively. The endpoint was MACE, including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, heart failure hospitalization, coronary artery revascularization procedure, and stroke. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate the hazard ratios. The discriminative performance between classifications were compared using Harrell's C-statistics. The agreement was assessed via Cohen's Kappa. Results: This study included 440 patients, with approximately 70% of Thai patients exhibiting a CAC score. CAC score distributed higher in male than female and increased with age. Both CAC score classification demonstrated the acceptable predictive performance. However, fair agreement was observed between classifications (Cohen's kappa 0.51, 95%CI 0.42-0.59). Within the absolute classification, a higher CAC score was associated with increased hazard ratios for MACE across stratified age-sex-specific percentile levels. In contrast, the hazard ratios for MACE did not consistently rise with higher age-sex-specific percentile CAC score when stratified by absolute CAC score levels. Conclusions: Both absolute and age-sex-specific percentile CAC score demonstrated acceptable performance in predicting MACE. However, the absolute CAC score classification may be more suitable for risk stratification within the Thai clinical cohort. Our findings offer supportive information that could inform future recommendations for CAC score testing criteria within national clinical practice guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitjanukit et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular risk stratification (n=440). Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score vs. CAC score of 0 was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death, MI, heart failure hospitalization, coronary revascularization, and stroke (HR 18.40, 95% CI 5.38-62.87, p=≤0.001). Compared to a score of zero, an absolute coronary artery calcium score >400 was associated with a significantly increased hazard for MACE (HR 18.40) in a Thai clinical cohort.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: