This paper attempts to explain the concept of “pro-poor growth”, and argues that it represents a major departure from the “trickle-down” phenomenon. It proposes a new indicator—the pro-poor growth index—that measures the degree to which growth can be considered to be pro-poor. The new indicator is used to analyze the nature of economic growth in three countries, namely, Republic of Korea, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, and Thailand.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kakwani et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: