Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals competition intensity influences equilibrium locations and welfare in vertical markets.
This paper explores the impact of intensity of rivalry in downstream market on the equilibrium locations of the downstream firms under a vertical market structure á la Hotelling. We find that: (i) the presence of upstream firms softens the spatial competition in downstream market; (ii) minimum differentiation cannot be achieved as the equilibrium outcome and the equilibrium product differentiation is insufficient relative to socially optimum; (iii) social welfare is higher with a higher weight attached to intensity of rivalry, which is different from the non-monotonic relationship under the horizontal market case; (iv) the equilibrium product differentiation is independent of bargaining power under the two-part tariff contracts, which is different from Brekke and Straume (2004) under linear pricing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: