PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1997Review of Financial Studies149 citations

Do Competing Specialists and Preferencing Dealers Affect Market Quality?

View Full Paper
RBRobert H. BattalioJGJason GreeneRJRobert H. Jennings

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We empirically demonstrate that the opportunities the Boston Stock Exchange and the Cincinnati Stock Exchange offer members to take the other side of their customers’ orders through affiliated market makers (to internalize orders) have little short-run effect on posted or effective bid-ask spreads. This is true despite substantial movement of order flow away from the New York Stock Exchange when trading under one of these regional stock exchange programs begins. These results contrast with the adverse effects of market fragmentation and internalization predicted by some theoretical market microstructure analyses and the popular financial press.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Battalio et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a204ec41d7d35d060d1eb49https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/10.4.969
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Price, trade size, and information in securities markets1987 · 2,290 citations
  2. 2Differences in Execution Prices Among the NYSE, the Regionals, and the NASD2007 · 28 citations
  3. 3The Economics of Liquidity Services1972 · 427 citations
  4. 4An Empirical Study of the Effect of Rule 19c-31990 · 23 citations
  5. 5Quotes, Order Flow, and Price Discovery1997 · 82 citations