BACKGROUND: Active, specific, and professionally led physical exercise is an effective treatment for chronic pain, and self-efficacy is correlated to positive treatment outcomes. At present, there is limited knowledge of self-efficacy for exercise in patients with chronic pain. PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and aspects of validity of the Swedish version of the Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale (SEE-SV) in patients with chronic pain. METHODS: Patients with chronic pain were recruited from a specialist clinic. The Swedish version of the SEE was used. Reliability was evaluated through internal consistency, test-retest, and measurement error (standard error of measurement, SEM and smallest detectable change, SDC). Construct validity was calculated using the correlation between the SEE-SV and other well-established evaluation instruments. Content validity was evaluated both from a patient and a health-care professional perspective. RESULTS: In total, 44 patients, 31 women and 13 men (mean age 40 years), participated in the study. The SEE-SV had good test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.95) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.97). Regarding measurement error, SEM was 4.9 and SDC 13.5. Moderate correlation was seen between SEE-SV and a pain-specific self-efficacy questionnaire (rs = 0.52). The majority of patients and health-care professionals considered the SEE-SV to be relevant and easy to understand. CONCLUSION: The SEE-SV showed a good internal consistency, item-to-total correlation, and test-retest reliability (ICC). A relatively high SDC indicates an individual variability of the test results. The content validity was satisfactory. Regarding the construct validity, further studies are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dahlbäck et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: