PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 10, 2006The Journal of Urology322 citations

5-Year Outcomes of Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

View Full Paper
BLBrian R. LaneIGInderbir S. Gill

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is increasingly a definitive therapeutic option in patients with a small renal mass. Intermediate term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy are excellent up to a mean followup of 3 years. We present outcomes in 56 patients, each of whom has now completed a minimum of 5 years of followup after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of the 557 laparoscopic partial nephrectomies performed at our institution 58 patients with a localized tumor have completed more than 5 years since surgery. Clinical and renal functional data on 56 patients (97%) were obtained from medical records, radiographic reports and patient contact via telephone. RESULTS: Average patient age was 64 years and 9% were symptomatic at presentation. Average tumor size was 2.9 cm. On histopathology renal cell carcinoma was confirmed in 37 cases (66%) and pathological tumor stage was pT1a in 32 (86%). Final surgical margin was positive for cancer in 1 patient. Median serum creatinine preoperatively and postoperatively was 0.9 and 1.0 mg/dl, respectively. No patient with normal baseline serum creatinine undergoing elective laparoscopic partial nephrectomy had postoperative chronic renal insufficiency (serum creatinine more than 2 mg/dl). At a median followup of 5.7 years (range 5.0 to 6.9) no distant recurrence (0%) and a single local recurrence (2.7%) were detected. Overall and cancer specific survival was 86% and 100%, respectively, at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the initial report in the literature of oncological and renal functional outcomes 5 years after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with excellent results comparable to those of open nephron sparing surgery. At our center laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is an established alternative to open partial nephrectomy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lane et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2053f7497d35c09ae72313https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.093
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: clinicopathologic features predictive of patient outcome2003 · 54 citations
  2. 2Efficacy of Nephron-Sparing Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Analysis Based on the New 1997 Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging System1999 · 302 citations
  3. 3LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR RENAL TUMOR: DUPLICATING OPEN SURGICAL TECHNIQUES2002 · 519 citations
  4. 4Disease Outcome in Patients With Low Stage Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Nephron Sparing or Radical Surgery1996 · 376 citations
  5. 5Clinical experience with nephron-sparing surgery in the presence of a normal contralateral kidney.1995 · 39 citations