The political status of strangers in African societies, particularly in urban areas, has been insufficiently analysed. 1 This may be partly because studies of African politics and political development have been dominated by a conceptual framework which contrasts two types of society, the ‘traditional’ or ‘tribal’ and the ‘modern’ or ‘developed’. The former usually implies a rural community with a relatively self- sufficient political system. 2 In such a society, the traditional leaders are usually associated with a particular ethnic group and territory; and their authority may be derived from sacred sources, such as tradition itself, ties to land, or genealogical links to ancestors. In the ‘modern’ society, leadership is assumed to be ‘rational’ and ‘secular’, oriented towards western rather than traditional values. 3 Political development has often been somewhat vaguely conceived as the transformation of a society from the traditional to the modern type.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Enid Schildkrout (1970) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: