Key result
Only 14.3% of eligible patients preferred a standard cardiac rehabilitation program, with basic medical care or lack of health insurance being the strongest predictor of non-participation (OR 10.01).
Authors
Loading...
Insurance barriers limit CR preference; leaves open whether alternative models boost uptake in observational data.
Cross-Sectional (n=328)
No
Odds Ratio: 10.01 (95% CI 3.9–25.68)
p-value: p=<0.001
Jin et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute coronary syndrome (n=328). Basic medical care or lack of health insurance vs. Free medical care or commercial health insurance was evaluated on Non-participation in standard cardiac rehabilitation program (OR 10.01, 95% CI 3.90-25.68, p=<0.001). Only 14.3% of eligible patients preferred a standard cardiac rehabilitation program, with basic medical care or lack of health insurance being the strongest predictor of non-participation (OR 10.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: