Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It is shown that the flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique is complicated by the effect of radiation damping, leading to problems in calibrating this method on phantoms and to inaccuracies in measured flows. A modified scheme called FAIRER (FAIR excluding radiation damping) is proposed, which suppresses the damping effects by employing very weak magnetic field gradients (0.06 G/cm) during the inversion recovery, spin-echo, and predelay periods. Results on phantoms and in vivo on cat brain are presented that demonstrate that FAIRER effectively solves these problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: