Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To complete a third round audit of management of shoulder pain using an integrated care pathway, to evaluate pro forma documentation and to determine outcome. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Thirty-four patients with upper limb paresis admitted to a rehabilitation unit during a 22-month period had shoulder pain and were included in the integrated care pathway. METHODS: Retrospective review of pro forma documentation against pre-determined standards. RESULTS: Compared with the second round audit, performance against 5 out of 9 standards for initial assessment and documentation had improved, and ranged from 56% to 94%. Achievement of 9 further standards relating to continued management ranged from 44% to 97%. Variance was not always well recorded. Shoulder pain resolved or improved in 18/34 (53%) of patients. CONCLUSION: Introducing the pro forma improved standards of documentation and demonstrated a positive outcome in over half the patients. Some problems with developing and maintaining integrated care pathways in the context of rehabilitation are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jackson et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: