Key result
High-fat diet promotes EGFR-driven lung cancer in mice, linked to altered immunity and upregulated CRP.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to understand the effects of a high-fat diet on lung cancer progression and biomarkers.
A high-fat diet promotes lung cancer progression in a transgenic mouse model by altering the immune microenvironment and upregulating C-reactive protein.
To understand the effects of a high-fat diet (HFD) on lung cancer progression and biomarkers, we here used an inducible mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-driven lung cancer transgenic mouse model fed a regular diet (RD) or HFD. The HFD lung cancer (LC-HFD) group exhibited significant tumor formation and deterioration, such as higher EGFR activity and proliferation marker expression, compared with the RD lung cancer (LC-RD) group. Transcriptomic analysis of the lung tissues revealed that the significantly changed genes in the LC-HFD group were highly enriched in immune-related signaling pathways, suggesting that an HFD alters the immune microenvironment to promote tumor growth. Cytokine and adipokine arrays combined with a comprehensive analysis using meta-database software indicated upregulation of C-reactive protein (CRP) in the LC-HFD group, which presented with increased lung cancer proliferation and metastasis; this was confirmed experimentally. Our results imply that an HFD can turn the tumor growth environment into an immune-related pro-tumorigenic microenvironment and demonstrate that CRP has a role in promoting lung cancer development in this microenvironment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hsu et al. (2023) studied Lung adenocarcinoma. High-fat diet (HFD) vs. Regular diet (RD) was evaluated on Tumor formation, deterioration, and biomarker expression. A high-fat diet promoted tumor formation and deterioration in an EGFR-driven lung cancer mouse model, associated with an altered immune microenvironment and upregulation of C-reactive protein.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: