PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 7, 2005Oxford Economic Papers454 citations

Job satisfaction and gender segregation

View Full Paper
KBKeith A. BenderSDSusan M. DonohueJHJohn S. Heywood

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Using data from the US, the determinants of overall job satisfaction are estimated as part of explaining 'the paradox of the contented female worker'. Confirming earlier studies women report higher job satisfaction than men and higher job satisfaction in workplaces dominated by women workers. The US data allow us to demonstrate that men and women value job flexibility differently and that once differences in the extent of job flexibility are accounted for, the gender composition of the workplace plays no role in determining the job satisfaction of women. Thus, women in female dominated workplaces may report higher job satisfaction because they value job flexibility and so choose to dominate the workplaces that provide job flexibility. Copyright 2005, Oxford University Press.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bender et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20583ae6386eb04298f3d2https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpi015
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Payment Schemes and Gender in Germany2002 · 108 citations
  2. 2Job Satisfaction, Comparison Earnings, and Gender2000 · 361 citations
  3. 3Why women earn less than men in self-employment2001 · 194 citations
  4. 4Sex Differences in Job Attribute Preferences among Managers and Business Students2000 · 116 citations
  5. 5Compensation of Cooperating Factors1976 · 83 citations