PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1988Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis318 citations

Responses of the L5178Y tk+/tk− mouse lymphoma cell forward mutation assay ii: 18 coded chemicals

View Full Paper
DMDouglas McGregorABAlison BrownPCPamela Cattanach

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Eighteen chemicals were tested for their mutagenic potential in the L5178Y tk+/- mouse lymphoma cell forward mutation assay by the use of procedures based upon those described by Clive and Spector Mutat Res 44:269-278, 1975 and Clive et al Mutat Res 59:61-108, 1979. Cultures were exposed to the chemicals for 4 hr, then cultured for 2 days before plating in soft agar with or without trifluorothymidine (TFT), 3 micrograms/ml. The chemicals were tested at least twice. Significant responses were obtained with benzofuran, benzyl chloride, bromodichloromethane, butylated hydroxytoluene, chlorendic acid, o-chlorobenzalmalonitrile, 1,2,3,4-diepoxybutane, dimethyl formamide, dimethyl hydrogen phosphite, furfural, glutaraldehyde, hydroquinone, 8-hydroxyquinoline, and resorcinol. Apart from bromodichloromethane, butylated hydroxytoluene and dimethyl hydrogen phosphite, rat liver S9 mix was not a requirement for the activity of any of these compounds. Chemicals not identified as mutagens were water, tert-butyl alcohol, pyridine, and witch hazel.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McGregor et al. (1988) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a205840e33fe3d55198f305https://doi.org/10.1002/em.2850110110
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper