Key result
Diabetes linked to ~2.3-fold higher odds of metacognition impairment in hospitalized cardiac patients.
Why the study?
Executive function is associated with compliance with medical recommendations, but its associations with cardiac patient demographics and cardiac rehabilitation attendance needed to be identified.
Does self-reported executive function impairment predict cardiac rehabilitation attendance, and what clinical characteristics are associated with this impairment in hospitalized cardiac patients?
Observational (n=316)
No
Does self-reported executive function impairment predict cardiac rehabilitation attendance, and what clinical characteristics are associated with this impairment in hospitalized cardiac patients?
Odds Ratio: 2.27 (95% CI 1.12–4.63)
p-value: p=0.02
Self-reported executive function testing during hospitalization does not reliably predict subsequent cardiac rehabilitation attendance, though diabetes and male sex are associated with higher rates of metacognitive impairment.
Self-reported executive function screening should not yet guide cardiac rehabilitation predictions; leaves open diabetes-metacognition links for prospective study.
PURPOSE: Executive function (ExF), the ability to do complex cognitive tasks like planning and refraining from impulsive behavior, is associated with compliance with medical recommendations. The present study identified associations between self-reported ExF and demographics of patients with cardiac disease as well as with cardiac rehabilitation (CR) attendance. METHODS: Self-reported ExF impairment was measured using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) on 316 individuals hospitalized for CR-qualifying cardiac events. Scores were calculated for a global measure (Global Executive Composite [GEC]) and the two BRIEF indices: Behavioral Regulation Index and Metacognition Index (MCI). Participants were followed up post-discharge to determine CR attendance. Univariate logistic regressions between ExF measures and demographic variables were conducted, as were multiple logistic regressions to identify significant, independent predictors. Analyses were conducted using clinical (T scores ≥ 65) and subclinical (T scores ≥ 60) criteria for significant ExF impairment as outcomes. One-way analyses of variance were performed between ExF impairment and CR attendance. RESULTS: Self-reported ExF deficits were relatively rare; 8.9% had at least subclinical scores on the GEC. Using the subclinical criterion for the MCI, having diabetes mellitus (DM) and being male were significant, independent predictors of MCI impairment. No significant relationship was found between ExF and CR attendance. CONCLUSION: Using the subclinical criterion only, individuals with DM and males were significantly more likely to have MCI impairment. No significant effect of ExF impairment on CR attendance was found, suggesting that self-reported ExF measured in the hospital may not be an appropriate measure for predicting behavioral outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katz et al. (2023) conducted an observational in CR-qualifying cardiac events (n=316). Diabetes mellitus vs. No diabetes mellitus was evaluated on Metacognition Index (MCI) impairment (subclinical criterion, T-scores ≥ 60) (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.12-4.63, p=0.02). Diabetes mellitus independently predicted self-reported metacognition impairment (OR 2.27) in hospitalized cardiac patients, though executive function deficits did not significantly predict cardiac rehabilitation attendance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: