Key result
Trends in hospital procedure volume over time (increasing or decreasing) did not significantly influence 30-day patient mortality across 10 high-risk surgeries compared to unchanged volume.
Why the study?
To evaluate the practice makes perfect concept by investigating whether patient outcomes improve in hospitals with significantly increased volume of high-risk surgery over time.
Does treatment at hospitals with increasing or decreasing procedure volumes over time improve in-hospital mortality and 30-day outcomes compared to hospitals with unchanged volumes in patients undergoing high-risk surgery?
Observational (n=759,928)
Yes
Does treatment at hospitals with increasing or decreasing procedure volumes over time improve in-hospital mortality and 30-day outcomes compared to hospitals with unchanged volumes in patients undergoing high-risk surgery?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Volume trends were not associated with mortality differences; leaves open whether stable volumes affect high-risk surgical outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The "practice makes perfect" concept considers the more frequent a hospital performs a procedure, the better the outcome of the procedure. We aimed to study this concept by investigating whether patient outcomes improve in hospitals with a significantly increased volume of high-risk surgery over time and whether a learning effect existed at the individual hospital level. METHODS: We included all patients who underwent one of 10 digestive, cardiovascular and orthopaedic procedures between 2010 and 2014 from the French nationwide hospitals database. For each procedure, we identified three groups of hospitals according to volume trend (increased, decreased, or no change). In-hospital mortality, reoperation, and unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days were compared between groups using Cox regressions, taking into account clustering of patients within hospitals and potential confounders. Individual hospital learning effect was investigated by considering the interaction between hospital groups and procedure year. RESULTS: Over 5 years, 759,928 patients from 694 hospitals were analysed. Patients' mortality in hospitals with procedure volume increase or decrease over time did not clearly differ from those in hospitals with unchanged volume across the studied procedures (e.g., Hazard Ratios [95%] of 1.04 [0.93-1.17] and 1.08 [0.97-1.21] respectively for colectomy). Furthermore, patient outcomes did not improve or deteriorate in hospitals with increased or decreased volume of procedures over time (e.g., 1.01 [0.95-1.08] and 0.99 [0.92-1.05] respectively for colectomy). CONCLUSIONS: Trend in hospital volume over time did not appear to influence patient outcomes based on real-world data. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02788331, June 2, 2016.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Payet et al. (2020) conducted an observational in High-risk surgery (digestive, cardiovascular, orthopaedic) (n=759,928). Trend in hospital procedure volume over time (increased or decreased) vs. Hospitals with unchanged procedure volume was evaluated on In-hospital mortality within 30 days (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.93-1.17). Trends in hospital procedure volume over time (increasing or decreasing) did not significantly influence 30-day patient mortality across 10 high-risk surgeries compared to unchanged volume.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: