Why the study?
Does new generation cryoballoon ablation improve 1-year freedom from atrial fibrillation compared to contact force sensing radiofrequency ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=96)
No
Does new generation cryoballoon ablation improve 1-year freedom from atrial fibrillation compared to contact force sensing radiofrequency ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
New generation cryoballoon ablation provides a similar 1-year arrhythmia-free survival rate compared to contact force-sensing radiofrequency ablation in paroxysmal AF, but with significantly shorter procedure times.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagy et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=96). New generation cryoballoon ablation vs. Contact force sensing radiofrequency ablation was evaluated on Freedom from atrial fibrillation at 1 year.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: