Key result
Cardiac rehabilitation attendance was associated with significantly lower 2-year mortality compared to non-attendance (2.8% vs 21.8%, P<0.0001) among patients surviving 30 days post-myocardial infarction.
Why the study?
Does attendance at a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programme improve 2-year mortality and invasive treatment rates in MI survivors compared to non-attendance?
Cohort (n=200)
Does attendance at a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programme improve 2-year mortality and invasive treatment rates in MI survivors compared to non-attendance?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Non-attendance to cardiac rehabilitation after MI is associated with significantly higher 2-year mortality, which is partly driven by the selection of healthier patients and socioeconomic factors.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is well documented, in randomised trials, to reduce mortality risk after myocardial infarction (MI). Selection of healthy patients for CR is a relatively unexplored problem. Our aims were to identify predictors of CR-attendance and to describe the prognosis as concerns mortality, re-admission and invasive treatment among CR-attendees as compared to CR-non-attendees. METHODS: From a cohort of 138 290 persons aged 30-69 years, we identified consecutive MI patients, between 1 April 2000 and 31 March 2002. There were 206 MI patients, who survived until admission, and among the 200 who survived 30 days, 145 (72.5%) attended a comprehensive CR programme. Data were obtained from patient charts and from Danish population registers, and as a result we had no non-participation for the study. RESULTS: The 2-year mortality proportions for patients surviving the first 30 days of admission were 2.8 and 21.8% among CR-attendees and CR-non-attendees, respectively (P < 0.0001). Among CR-non-attendees, there was a smaller fraction having an invasive treatment performed as compared with CR-attendees. By multiple logistic regression controlling for age and sex, CR-attendance was associated with chest pain, whereas CR-non-attendance was associated with low gross income, single living and inverted T-wave in the electrocardiogram. CONCLUSION: CR attendance rate was 72.5%. Non-attendees have a higher mortality risk, which in part may be attributed to selection of healthy patients. Non-attendees are older and more likely to have atypical symptoms at admission, a low socioeconomic status and to live alone. Special attention is needed to improve CR attendance among such patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nielsen et al. (2008) conducted a cohort in Myocardial infarction (n=200). Cardiac rehabilitation attendance vs. Cardiac rehabilitation non-attendance was evaluated on 2-year mortality (p=<0.0001). Cardiac rehabilitation attendance was associated with significantly lower 2-year mortality compared to non-attendance (2.8% vs 21.8%, P<0.0001) among patients surviving 30 days post-myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: