This paper criticizes the circularity reading of Frege's argument for the indefinability of truth. According to this reading, Frege is appealing to a sort of circularity in the argument. I argue that the circularity reading is interpretatively incorrect, or makes Frege's argument a non-starter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Junyeol Kim (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: